@Chillkroete77#1 -- Murder is a primarily LEGAL term: "the crime of unlawfully killing a person especially with malice aforethought" (source:
www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/murder). What is lawful or not is decided by the courts. While we can each have our opinions, they are nothing but that: an opinion, with no real bearing on the case. The court of public opinion has been known to be wrong in the past, and imho "armchair justice" is a bad idea.
In the Floyd case, the verdict will hinge on whether his resisting arrest + drugs in his system + whatever else was going on at the time was enough to LEGALLY justify the amount of force used. Imho, the max the officer can get (if convicted at all) is manslaughter, as the lawyers will argue (most likely successfully) that he had no intent to kill.
#2 -- Now, whether you like it or not, ALL facts in the case matter, certainly in the eyes of the law. You are entitled to any opinion, however imho an UNBIASED opinion should take ALL the facts into account.
Now, to clarify: the officer did not hold his knee on Floyd's neck because of a $20 fake bill, he did (or claims he did) because he was resisting arrest. I fully agree he should have found a better solution to restrain Floyd, especially after he said "I can't breathe". And it's unfortunate the officer's poor decision claimed a life. But to claim all other facts are irrelevant (save that he kept his knee there) is simply wrong.
#3 -- Glad to hear that. But I am yet to read a post here encouraging #BLM to advocate for that. Wonder why?
#4 -- Sorry, but the burden of proof is on the one who made the allegations. :)