yes!
yes
it's worth the time and effort!
10,000 times yes
yes
Bug!
Bughouse has bred the collective thinking of 2 people that act in concert like demigods, super tense relationships with partners . But take the best zh players and make them 2 on 2 in bughouse and the speed and creative tactics of what standard chess tries to achieve new clever unthought of moves really is scene through bughouse, OWNER OF LICHESS MAKE BUGHOUSE A THING!!! ALSO Thank you owner of lichess, great site, hope you profit from it like chess.com
I will say yes to bughouse only if crazyhouse will then be replaced by hostage chess.
yes
So before we can have bughouse we need to answer these questions first and many more.
Would your rating be dependent on your opponent and how would matchmaking in the lobby pair players.
Where in the UI screen would your teammates board be displayed, currently there is no room.
Would swiss style tournaments still work with allowing top players to be evenly paired against lower players.
How would stockfish need to be reconfigured to analyse both games.
If a player is banned would all three other players get their ratings refunded, how about the teammate would they lose points because their teammate cheated.
How would the servers save two games linked together, and how would you search this in the database.
Would your rating be dependent on your opponent and how would matchmaking in the lobby pair players.
Where in the UI screen would your teammates board be displayed, currently there is no room.
Would swiss style tournaments still work with allowing top players to be evenly paired against lower players.
How would stockfish need to be reconfigured to analyse both games.
If a player is banned would all three other players get their ratings refunded, how about the teammate would they lose points because their teammate cheated.
How would the servers save two games linked together, and how would you search this in the database.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.