I'm sorry for probably raising this topic for the 100th time (I couldn't get the lichess search option to work properly), but could someone tell me why lichess still does not have tournaments with a fixed number of rounds, e.g. using a swiss pairing system?
I understand the initial motivation and innovation of the arenas and sure, those tournaments should definitely stay. But with things like Lichess Teams, where chess clubs can now resume playing online during times of quarantine, I believe there is quite a big demand for the option of swiss pairings, with a fixed number of rounds.
From personal experience I know quite a few chess clubs have switched to the-site-which-shall-not-be-named as that site does offer chess clubs and internal swiss tournaments, as opposed to lichess. At the same time I believe many of those would be happy to switch to the open, free lichess if it supported this as well. (And no, many of them are not looking to play e.g. 10-20 player rapid tournaments in the arena format.)
Anyway: I understand that initially there was no need to implement this alternative format, but maybe it's time to reconsider?
I understand the initial motivation and innovation of the arenas and sure, those tournaments should definitely stay. But with things like Lichess Teams, where chess clubs can now resume playing online during times of quarantine, I believe there is quite a big demand for the option of swiss pairings, with a fixed number of rounds.
From personal experience I know quite a few chess clubs have switched to the-site-which-shall-not-be-named as that site does offer chess clubs and internal swiss tournaments, as opposed to lichess. At the same time I believe many of those would be happy to switch to the open, free lichess if it supported this as well. (And no, many of them are not looking to play e.g. 10-20 player rapid tournaments in the arena format.)
Anyway: I understand that initially there was no need to implement this alternative format, but maybe it's time to reconsider?