Search "user:mrbasso"

The accuracy is calculated badly. Still you are expected to blunder back at that rating, not to play the game perfectly to the end. But only one game is not enough to say anything. It could have been …

@paulw7-uk said in #11: > if you have legitimate concerns about a game played then use the report function, that is what it is there for. provide a link to the game and a brief explanation of your con…

Just report the account but I see no cheating...

@possum_hollow said in #1: > Has anyone seen a response or evidence of an action taken after using the report form? Sometimes, if the cheating is fairly obvious, yes. Cheating is more a problem in rap…

I wouldn't call it inferior. It has a lot of success in online chess. Certainly more than 1.e4 and 1.d4. OTB you need to be patient if you play an opening like this. But in online chess the bad answer…

@Cedur216 said in #63: > that means it's alright, isn't it? Not sure... Since I was on provisional in classical I lost 94 points to a now banned cheater and another 94 points against a 1400 because th…

At your rating an opening repertoire is a waste of time. Better learn the strategical ideas of the openings you play!

@Brian-E said in #57: > It would be of doubtful value because for non-specialists it's impossible to be certain whether someone is cheating or not. > > The first category you mention, which you must i…

I could show you dozens of counterexamples where obvious cheaters were not banned and others were banned although they didn't cheat IF I'm allowed to post games but I'm not...

Of course all this automatic cheating detections fail if the suspected player only cheats occasionally and/or possibly makes some belivable mistakes on purpose.