Anyone got a Degree in Mathematics / Number theory and willing to help Student- Legendre Conjecture)

The speed of gravity is not c, its BIGGER cuz that's a cool thing to say. I rest my case.

lol ! there is a and a only on speed which is the same in all referentials => this speed is the maximum AND in practice the speed wich is the same il all referential is the light ( verified at 10^-10 sec if i remember )

pfff...:P is INFINITE, cuz nothing has to movez. especial trik

the error is logarithmic to the number of primes, because u need to put one number wrong and the rest are ok that is the trick,
so u dont give a damn about the primes u only worry about the size of the set, Its just that u are still focusing on the concept of precision and in the concept of number but that is misleading,
remember that its always sets.
I am speaking of memory u know, I did this some time ago but I can check the details if u want.

i not focus on what u think i focus on and muchmuch not precision. its not aboot information. i have nothing to learn, i kill time only, in the dumbdumbdumbdumb hamsterwheel called hamsterwheel

You just transform the prime numbers into a new number and u get repercursion, and then u understand the speed, u dont even have to look at the prime numbers to understand the speed,
they are irrelevant, It becomes a ln ln ln ln ln .... n or something like that more or less, its just how they work, because its not the property of the primes really, its a property of counting, thats why u dont need to know the primes to know the speed, thats my cup of tea not sure if its ok but I like it.

yes, you like it. also, movement and math do not really mix. you can say it like that too. numbers are dead.

I've had a little breakthrough... I'm trying to prove it by Reductio ad Absurdum

#6 Aren't bisectors enough?

@Vale18349276 they are